deviance :: essays research papers

SUMMARY OF DEVIANCEIn the eighth chapter of Sociology, I. Robertson explains that there atomic number 18 many explanations about deviance but not enough, so he tries to find closer peerless and clarify the deviance. He starts with a appargonnt movement which is who is deviant? and lists of its answers.In the list of its answers, Robertson benefits from Simons study and he says that the devises refer to mickle and acts that other people strongly disapprove of (23).On the other hand, Robertson then counters it with contrasted topic of sociological literature.He claims that the concept of this definition is found slippery one by sociologists.After this idea,Robertson questions second definition which is dviance is any behavior that doesnt aline to social norms(24).However, Robertson judges this definiton as not helpful.He exemplifies that eating three meals in a day can be deviant behavior for more or less unimportant social norms.Therefore, Robertson argues that minor deviati ons arent included in the finicky sociological interest.He claims that the main idea of sociological interest is about violations which are regarded as offensive by majority of people. And he says that one word is stigma a bad reputation or disapproving by a lot of people. After this analysis, he benefits from second definition and improves it, so he finally declares a definition, which is deviance refers to behavior or characteristics that rifle significant social norms and expectations and are negatively valued by braggart(a) numbers of people as a result(24). He emphasizes that this definition clarifies deviance more than others.He continues with clarification of deviance by service of process of main three points. Firstly, he claims that there is no close kindred between deviance and statistical rarity. He exemplifies that jogging before the eat can be unusual statistically but not a reason for deviance. However, Robertson then states that some norms can be modified or ab andoned clip to time. He makes clear it with an example that premarital conjure was prohibited in American society several years ago. However, forthwith the majority of American society admits this event normally. As a result, Robertson declares intemperately that norms can lose their force or influence as time passes. Secondly, Robertson argues about division of normals and deviants. He explains briefly that there is no segmentation between normals and deviants. He illustrates that if we divide people as thieves, patients (mental disordered) or dose users, we will have a few normal people. In admission to them, Robertson says, deviance is relative(25).