Arguments of the death penalty Essay

Is death the apology of a murder or ar we merely subduing ourselves by performing the same heinous act? This agate line had been debated for many decades and although some feel that death is the answer to a murder, there are others that find it completely dotty. Through a careful depth psychology between Edward Kochs Death and Justice and David Brucks The Death penalisation, I believe Koch had the better argument in claiming that death is the justification of a murder. I feel that if someone were to cleanup a nonher soulfulness, we stomach all rights to sentence them to a death penalty to guarantee much(prenominal) a horrific crime would not happen again.If someone had the fearlessness to take the life of another then he/she should have the endurance to face the consequences. Although many believed that the death penalty is barbaric, I believe if it is not done, it would hinder Americas goal in working toward a country that possesses the least crime rates. In Kochs essay he compared cancer with the death penalty. Today we are faced with the choice of permit the cancer spread withmethods that considered barbaricBut to give upwould for sure delay the discovery of an eventual cure. (Koch, paragraph 6) What Koch tried to convey to us is that certain methods of reducing cancer symptoms may be found barbaric but it is because of these methods we forget find an eventual cure. This applies to the death penalty as well. Although someone may believe the death penalty is barbaric, they can all the same support it because if we create a society that does not tolerate the shabbiness of murder, incidents of murder go forth decrease.In Brucks argument he attacked mainstay by stating that the death penalty was applied in a homophobic manner through a man by the name of Ernest Knighton. Knighton had killed a gas station owner during a robberyWhy was Knighton electrocuted when near everyone else who committed the same offense was not? Was it because he was bla ck? Was it because his victim and all 12 members of the jurywere right? (Bruck, paragraph 10) Hes stating the jury was racist to Knighton because he was black and the death penalty does not serve justice.I believe that his isnt so because the appeals for each manslayer are long and accurate. Our courts are made so that each shift is handled effectively and thoroughly to bring forth justice in the case. Koch verbalize It is not justice to exclude everyone from the penalty of thelaw if a a few(prenominal) are found to be so favored. Justice requires that the law be applied equally to all. (Koch, paragraph 11). It is not a racial military issue because the appeals process is long and elaborate for every individual and a person will not be given any less help due to their race.The death penalty served justice to people who had abused it. It will ensure a safer society because potential murderers would be afraid to kill because if they did, they would be executed as well. If we do not continue to consecrate this then murder rates would steadily increase. It is also not a racial issue because each case is observed with the full expiration of the law. I believe the death penalty should continue to be instated because it will provide for a quicker progression to a murder-free America.