Social Mobility Essay -- essays research papers

Mobility is the characteristic of e very social system.Social mobility is themovement of individuals, families and groups from sensationsocial position toan other(a). It whitethorn be studied in term of redistributionof resources and poweramong the different social strata and its effect onthe deal involved. In thestatus societies the social status of the person isdetermined from his work.Social mobility occurs whenever muckle move acrosssocial phase boundaries, fromone &8992occupational take aim to another. The study ofSocial Mobility is importantfor a number of reasons -1. It matters to mickle to sustain on in life,2. We ro intent study peoples life histories,3. We can find oneself changes in the class system,4. The more mobile a order is may show it to be moreopen and fairer,5. Mobility affects the way classes ar formed, their coat and shape.A common sense notion regarding class in the U.S canbe represented as a fewrich people on the top, few poor people at the bottom, and the middle classmajority in the center. Mostly everybody has acomfortable standard of living.If we take off the U.S. universe of discourse in 5 equalproportions and their correspondingshare of the grounds income we get the followingiTop 20% of the population receives 49.1% ofthe tally incomeiSecond top 20% of the population receives24.3% of the total incomeiMiddle 20% of the population receives 15% ofthe total incomeiSecond bottom 20% of the population receives8.9% of the total incomei butt joint 20% of the population receives 3.6% ofthe total incomeThe top 20% of the population take a shit a disproportionateshare of the incomecompared to their share in the population. Looking atthe standards of living byconsumption the ration between the top 20% and thebottom 20% is 91. Thiscomparison illustrates great inequality in US society.It is often said thathigh levels of inequality is necessary because itstimulates competition, itcreates incentives for excellence, and providesrewar ds for performance. The contradict perspective, on the other hand, argues thatpeople at the bottom wonttake it and they exit work towards changing the statusquo. For instance, poorpeople may use their vote to elect officials who willrepresent their interests... ...enturies. Itsroots are prime in religious literature of around1200-1000 BC, and, although ithas technically been abolished in India, in practiceit is still very much aliveand thriving. Being each one of these castes, doesaffect ones position insociety and by all means, the social mobility.Although there is not much line between the Brahmins, Kshatriyas andVaishyas, if one is a Harijanthere are self-evident hindrances. The term coined byMahatma Gandhi, literally meansPeople of the god, and it was meant in every waybecause these people alsocalled the untouchables, were literally the socialoutcastes and had zipssupport. Even till today, in Rural India the orthodoxpeople will not even drinkwater from their hands. However , the government to is fashioning efforts to abolish these distinctions.Social Mobility in India and in the US has a verydifferent concept. In the US,mobility is based on money, i.e. he who has moneydominates. However, in India,money doesnt play an all-important role. There areother factors that governsocial mobility and these factors do need to be lookedinto because some ofthese are not fit to exist in the 21st century.